Evidence-led Forex broker research

Choosing a Forex broker is hard. Finding the evidence shouldn’t be.

We test trading conditions and check broker claims against primary sources. We publish each ranking, comparison, review, or guide only when the evidence for that page is ready, so you can see what we found, how we got there, and what the evidence cannot tell you.

  • Methods shown
  • Sources dated
  • Limits stated
Research workflow Raw observations → checks → comparable evidence

What we research

Different broker questions need different kinds of research.

A shortlist, a head-to-head choice, and a first broker account are not the same decision. Rintrade uses four research formats, but releases each page only when its evidence is ready.

01 Rankings

A shortlist with rules you can see.

Each ranking starts with a specific question, market sample, and scoring method—not a claim that one broker is best for everyone.

02 Comparisons

The same questions, asked of two brokers.

We put two brokers through the same checklist and leave details out when the current evidence is not strong enough.

03 Reviews

The full picture of one broker.

Reviews bring verified costs, platforms, regulation, account conditions, and practical limitations into one place.

04 Guides

The context behind the numbers.

Plain-English guides explain spreads, fees, execution, leverage, platforms, and risk so you can judge the evidence for yourself.

How the work gets done

The page starts with a question, not a winner.

Before collecting data, we decide what the page is allowed to answer. A spread test cannot tell you which broker is safest. A regulator source cannot tell you how an order will execute. Keeping those boundaries clear is part of the research.

We collect evidence that fits the question, date the sources, and keep gaps visible. Affiliate links may support the site, but they never count as evidence or change a calculation.

Meet the analyst
  1. 01

    Set the rules

    Define the audience, comparison category, time window, and measurement before testing begins.

  2. 02

    Check the evidence

    Use hands-on data and primary sources where each belongs, with source dates attached.

  3. 03

    Make the work inspectable

    Validate files and calculations, then publish methodology and supporting data when appropriate.

  4. 04

    Say what it cannot answer

    Limitations, missing fields, dates, and commercial disclosures stay next to the conclusion.